management: be considered as science

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered as science	1.00
be considered science	0.98
be regarded as science	0.96
be in science	0.91
is science	0.90
be important in science	0.90
be important to science	0.90
be called science subject	0.87
is social science	0.85
be considered as art	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(solution, be in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(solution, be in science)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(variable, be important in science)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(variable, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(solution, be in science)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(variable, be important to science)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(solution, be in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(management, be considered as science)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered science)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(management, is science)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(management, be considered science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as art)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(management, be considered science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(management, be considered science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(management, be regarded as science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(management, is science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(management, is science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(management, be called science subject)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(management, is science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(management, be considered as art)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(management, is social science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as art)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(management, be considered as art)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(management, is social science)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(management, be called science subject)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(management, is social science)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(management, be called science subject)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(solution, be in science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(solution, be in science)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be considered as science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)