management: is social science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social science 1.00
is science 0.91
be in science 0.90
is social 0.89
be important to science 0.88
be important in science 0.88
be considered science 0.86
be considered as science 0.85
be called science subject 0.81
be important during science experiment 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(management, is social science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(management, is social science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(variable, be important during science experiment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(management, is social science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(solution, be in science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(management, is social science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(solution, be in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(variable, be important to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(variable, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(variable, be important during science experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(solution, be in science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important to science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important during science experiment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(management, is social science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(management, is social science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(solution, be in science)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(management, is social science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(variable, be important during science experiment)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(management, is social science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(management, is social science)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(management, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(management, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(management, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(management, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(management, be considered science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(management, be considered science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(management, be considered as science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(management, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(management, be called science subject)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(management, be called science subject)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(management, be called science subject)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(management, is social science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(solution, be in science)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(variable, be important during science experiment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(solution, be in science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(management, is social science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(variable, be important during science experiment)