management: be called science subject

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be called science subject	1.00
be considered science	0.88
be considered as science	0.87
be in science	0.86
is science	0.86
be important in science	0.85
be important to science	0.84
be regarded as science	0.82
be such difficult subject study	0.81
is social science	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(management, be called science subject)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(management, be called science subject)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(solution, be in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(management, be called science subject)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(solution, be in science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(variable, be important in science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(variable, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(solution, be in science)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(variable, be important to science)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(management, be called science subject)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(management, be called science subject)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(solution, be in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(management, be called science subject)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(management, be called science subject)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(management, be considered science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(management, is science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(management, be considered science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(management, be considered science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(management, be considered as science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(management, is science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(management, is science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(management, be such difficult subject study)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(management, be regarded as science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(management, be such difficult subject study)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(management, is social science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(management, is social science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(management, be such difficult subject study)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(management, is social science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(management, is social science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(management, be such difficult subject study)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(management, is science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(management, be called science subject)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(solution, be in science)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(solution, be in science)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(management, be called science subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)