management: be considered as art

Property	Similarity
be considered as art	1.00
is art	0.90
be defined as art	0.90
as science in addition to art	0.84
be considered as science	0.83
be regarded as science	0.82
be considered as life	0.81
be considered as concept	0.81
be considered as multi-faceted concept	0.81
be considered science	0.79

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(management, is art)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(management, be defined as art)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(management, be considered as concept)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(management, as science in addition to art)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(management, is art)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(management, be defined as art)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(management, be defined as art)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as concept)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as concept)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(management, be defined as art)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(management, be considered as concept)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(management, be considered as science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(management, be considered science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(management, is art)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(management, is art)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(management, be regarded as science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(management, be considered science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(management, be considered science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(management, as science in addition to art)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(management, as science in addition to art)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(management, as science in addition to art)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(management, be considered as art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

management: be considered as art

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible