management: be defined as art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined as art 1.00
be considered as art 0.90
is art 0.83
as science in addition to art 0.78
be regarded as science 0.76
be considered as concept 0.76
be considered as multi-faceted concept 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(management, be defined as art)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(management, is art)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(management, be considered as concept)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(management, as science in addition to art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(management, be considered as art)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as concept)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as art)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(management, is art)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(management, be considered as art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as concept)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(management, be considered as concept)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(management, is art)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(management, be regarded as science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(management, is art)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(management, as science in addition to art)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(management, as science in addition to art)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(management, as science in addition to art)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(management, be defined as art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(management, be defined as art)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(management, be defined as art)