management: be considered concept

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered concept 1.00
be considered as concept 0.99
be considered as multi-faceted concept 0.99
is concept 0.95
be considered multifaceted concept 0.88
be considered as art 0.78
be called universally social process 0.76
be considered as science 0.75
be considered as life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(management, be considered concept)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as concept)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(management, be considered as concept)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, is concept)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, is concept)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered multifaceted concept)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as concept)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(management, is concept)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(management, be considered as concept)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(management, is concept)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as art)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(management, be called universally social process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(management, be considered multifaceted concept)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(management, be considered as art)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(management, be considered as science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(management, be called universally social process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as art)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(management, be considered as art)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(management, be considered multifaceted concept)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(management, be called universally social process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(management, be considered multifaceted concept)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(management, be called universally social process)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered concept)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(management, be considered concept)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(management, be considered concept)