manager: need understand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need understand 1.00
understand organisational behaviour 0.96
understand behaviour 0.96
understand needs 0.94
need know 0.91
understand process 0.89
understand development 0.88
want know 0.87
understand process of learning 0.87
understand law 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manager, need understand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(employee, need understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(manager, need understand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(manager, need understand)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manager, need know)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manager, understand process of learning)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(manager, need know)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(manager, need know)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(manager, need know)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(manager, understand process of learning)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(manager, understand process of learning)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(manager, understand process of learning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(manager, need understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manager, need understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand)