manual: be better than automatic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents publication
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, document
Weight: 0.59
, accessory
Weight: 0.57
Siblings automatic transmission
Weight: 0.60
, dsm
Weight: 0.40
, fax machine
Weight: 0.34
, ventilation system
Weight: 0.33
, sewing machine
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than automatic 1.00
be faster than automatic 0.96
be cheaper than automatic 0.94
drive different from automatic 0.91
be better than manual 0.81
be better than automatics 0.81
be faster than automatics 0.80
be better than icd 0.80
be worse than manual 0.79
be cheaper than automatics 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(dsm, be better than icd)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(dsm, be better than icd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dsm, be better than icd)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be worse than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(manual, be better than automatic)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(manual, drive different from automatic)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manual, drive different from automatic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(manual, drive different from automatic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(manual, drive different from automatic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(manual, be better than automatics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(manual, be better than automatics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manual, be better than automatics)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manual, be better than automatic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dsm, be better than icd)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be better than manual)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)