automatic transmission: be better than manual

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.60
, manual
Weight: 0.60
Siblings automatic
Weight: 0.33
, compression
Weight: 0.32
, wiper
Weight: 0.32
, electronic device
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than manual 1.00
be faster than manual 0.96
be worse than manual 0.96
be more expensive than manual 0.95
be less efficient than manual 0.93
is manual 0.93
be better than manuals 0.88
be faster than manuals 0.87
be much slower than manuals 0.87
be more expensive than manuals 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be much slower than manuals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manual)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manuals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be better than manuals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(automatic, be better than manual)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manual)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(automatic, be better than manuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(automatic, be better than manuals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manuals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(automatic, be much slower than manuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic, be much slower than manuals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, be better than manual)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is manual)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(automatic transmission, is manual)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is manual)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is manual)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be better than manual)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(automatic, be better than manual)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient than manual)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manual)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(automatic, be better than manuals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(automatic, be much slower than manuals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manuals)