automatic: be more expensive than manual

Related concepts

Parents	application Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.49 , option Weight: 0.47 , club Weight: 0.47 , system Weight: 0.45
Siblings	automatic transmission Weight: 0.33 , time machine Weight: 0.31 , attachment Weight: 0.30 , defense system Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than manual	1.00
be better than manual	0.95
be less efficient than manual	0.95
be faster than manual	0.94
be more expensive than manuals	0.90
cost more than manuals	0.89
be much slower than manuals	0.86
be faster than manuals	0.86
is more expensive	0.86
use more fuel than manuals	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(automatic, be better than manual)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(automatic, be better than manual)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(automatic, be better than manual)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(automatic, is more expensive)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(automatic, is more expensive)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(automatic, is more expensive)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(automatic, is more expensive)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be better than manual)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)