automatic: be more expensive than manuals

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than manuals	1.00
cost more than manuals	0.98
be better than manuals	0.97
be faster than manuals	0.96
use more fuel than manuals	0.95
be much slower than manuals	0.94
be more expensive than manual	0.90
be better than manual	0.86
be less efficient than manual	0.86
be faster than manual	0.84

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(automatic, be better than manual)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be much slower than manuals)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(automatic, be better than manual)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manual)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manuals)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(automatic, be better than manual)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(automatic, cost more than manuals)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be better than manuals)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be less efficient than manual)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be faster than manual)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(automatic, use more fuel than manuals)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(automatic, be more expensive than manuals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(automatic, be better than manual)

Parents	application Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.49 , option Weight: 0.47 , club Weight: 0.47 , system Weight: 0.45
Siblings	automatic transmission Weight: 0.33 , time machine Weight: 0.31 , attachment Weight: 0.30 , defense system Weight: 0.30

automatic: be more expensive than manuals

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings