marketing: be explain with reference to basic management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
, business
Weight: 0.60
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.66
, planning
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.33
, engineering
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be explain with reference to basic management 1.00
contribute with reference to business government in general 0.83
was management change 0.77
is management 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is management)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(planning, is management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(planning, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(planning, is management)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(engineering, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(engineering, is management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(marketing, contribute with reference to business government in general)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(marketing, contribute with reference to business government in general)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marketing, is management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(marketing, contribute with reference to business government in general)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(marketing, was management change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(marketing, was management change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(marketing, is management)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marketing, is management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(marketing, was management change)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(marketing, contribute with reference to business government in general)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, was management change)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(planning, is management)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be explain with reference to basic management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(engineering, is management)