marketing: be for companies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
, business
Weight: 0.60
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.66
, planning
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.33
, engineering
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for companies 1.00
has state companies 0.95
be for company 0.84
be important to businesses 0.82
be to company 0.81
help small-scale businesses 0.80
help businesses 0.80
be important to small businesses 0.79
be for business 0.79
be in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(marketing, be for companies)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(marketing, has state companies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for company)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be important to small businesses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(marketing, be in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(marketing, be to company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marketing, be for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(marketing, be for company)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(marketing, has state companies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(marketing, be for company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(marketing, be to company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(marketing, be in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marketing, be to company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(marketing, be for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(marketing, be for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(marketing, be for company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(marketing, be in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(marketing, be important to small businesses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(marketing, has state companies)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(marketing, be important to small businesses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(marketing, has state companies)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(marketing, be important to small businesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for companies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marketing, be for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(marketing, be for companies)