marketing: has state companies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
, business
Weight: 0.60
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.66
, planning
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.33
, engineering
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state companies 1.00
be for companies 0.95
be for company 0.81
be to company 0.80
be important to businesses 0.79
help small-scale businesses 0.77
help businesses 0.77
be important to small businesses 0.77
very is important in company 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(marketing, has state companies)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(marketing, be for companies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(marketing, be for companies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(marketing, be for companies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(marketing, be to company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(marketing, be for company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(marketing, be for company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(marketing, be to company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marketing, be to company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(marketing, be for company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for companies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(marketing, be important to small businesses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(marketing, very is important in company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(marketing, very is important in company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(marketing, be important to small businesses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(marketing, very is important in company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(marketing, be important to small businesses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be important to small businesses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for company)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to company)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, very is important in company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(marketing, has state companies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marketing, has state companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(marketing, has state companies)