mcdonald: be called mcdonalds

Related concepts

Parents	food chain Weight: 0.65 , restaurant Weight: 0.62 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.62 , chain Weight: 0.62 , fast food chain Weight: 0.61
Siblings	mcdonalds Weight: 0.37 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.35 , mexican restaurant Weight: 0.35 , indian restaurant Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be called mcdonalds	1.00
leave walmart	0.78
be much more expensive in nyc	0.78
be called gaylord	0.78
have pepsi	0.77
be cheap in toronto	0.77
be french fries really made	0.77
is mondays	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(restaurant, have pepsi) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(restaurant, have pepsi)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have pepsi)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, is mondays)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be called gaylord)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(restaurant, have pepsi) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be called gaylord) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be called gaylord)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(italian restaurant, is mondays) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, is mondays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, leave walmart)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Salient(mcdonald, leave walmart)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, leave walmart)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(mcdonald, leave walmart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(restaurant, have pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be called gaylord)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, is mondays)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(mcdonald, be called mcdonalds) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(restaurant, have pepsi)