restaurant: be cheap in toronto

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap in toronto 1.00
be much more expensive in nyc 0.81
is cheap 0.80
is nyc 0.80
dallas tx 0.78
be expensive in norway 0.77
be popular in usa 0.76
be in mexico city 0.75
be in albuquerque 0.75
be in iceland expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is nyc)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(restaurant, is nyc)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(restaurant, be popular in usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)