restaurant: is nyc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nyc 1.00
be much more expensive in nyc 0.89
dallas tx 0.82
is york 0.81
be cheap in toronto 0.80
leave seattle 0.79
be in albuquerque 0.78
be in mexico city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(food store, is york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(food store, is york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food store, is york)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, leave seattle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(food store, is york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is nyc)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(steakhouse, leave seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, leave seattle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(restaurant, is nyc)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, is york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(steakhouse, leave seattle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(restaurant, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, is york)