meatball: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.57
, favorite
Weight: 0.56
, pasta
Weight: 0.54
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, potato salad
Weight: 0.36
, steak
Weight: 0.36
, ravioli
Weight: 0.35
, lasagna
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste like liver 0.82
smell bad 0.79
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.77
has sweetness sweet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(meatball, taste good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, smell bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(meatball, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dish, smell bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dish, smell bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(meatball, taste good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, smell bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(meatball, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(steak, taste like liver)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(steak, taste like liver)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(steak, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(steak, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lasagna, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(meatball, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(meatball, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(meatball, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(meatball, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meatball, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meatball, has quality bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(meatball, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dish, smell bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(steak, taste like liver)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spaghetti sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steak, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lasagna, has quality good)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dish, smell bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(meatball, taste good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)