mechanic: get paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid little 1.00
get paid 0.93
is paid 0.88
make little 0.85
is paid poorly 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(specialist, is paid)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid little)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(foreman, is paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(foreman, is paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(carpenter, get paid)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mechanic, get paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mechanic, make little)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, make little)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(mechanic, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mechanic, make little)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mechanic, make little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mechanic, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid little)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(foreman, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(mechanic, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)