mechanic: get paid little

Related concepts

Parents	specialist Weight: 0.64 , man Weight: 0.60 , guy Weight: 0.60 , element Weight: 0.59 , expert Weight: 0.59
Siblings	carpenter Weight: 0.35 , old man Weight: 0.35 , engineer Weight: 0.34 , foreman Weight: 0.34 , policeman Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
get paid little	1.00
get paid	0.93
is paid	0.88
make little	0.85
is paid poorly	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(specialist, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(specialist, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(specialist, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(specialist, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(mechanic, get paid little)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(carpenter, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid little)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(foreman, is paid)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(carpenter, get paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(carpenter, get paid)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(carpenter, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(mechanic, get paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(mechanic, make little)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, make little)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(mechanic, get paid)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(mechanic, make little)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(mechanic, make little)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(mechanic, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(mechanic, get paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid little)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(foreman, is paid)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(carpenter, get paid)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(mechanic, get paid little) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(specialist, is paid)