memory: be in computer measured

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flash memory
Weight: 0.82
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.63
, vision
Weight: 0.62
, buffer
Weight: 0.53
Siblings random access memory
Weight: 0.74
, disk
Weight: 0.62
, forget
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in computer measured 1.00
be in computer 0.87
be measured 20 20 0.86
be measured 0.86
be important in computer 0.86
is computer 0.86
be important to computer 0.85
be low on computer 0.85
be required in computer 0.84
be needed in computer 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vision, be measured)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(memory, be in computer measured)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vision, be measured)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(memory, be in computer measured)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vision, be measured)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vision, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(vision, be measured)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(vision, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vision, be measured)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vision, be measured)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(personal computer, is computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(memory, be in computer measured)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(memory, be important in computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important to computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(memory, be in computer measured)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(vision, be measured)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(vision, be measured)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(personal computer, is computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(vision, be measured)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(memory, be in computer measured)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(vision, be measured)