memory: be low on computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flash memory
Weight: 0.82
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.63
, vision
Weight: 0.62
, buffer
Weight: 0.53
Siblings random access memory
Weight: 0.74
, disk
Weight: 0.62
, forget
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low on computer 1.00
be in computer 0.90
is computer 0.89
be important in computer 0.88
be important to computer 0.88
is popular computer 0.85
be in computer measured 0.85
be needed in computer 0.84
be required in computer 0.83
is most popular computer 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is popular computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is most popular computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, is computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(personal computer, is computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is computer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(personal computer, is popular computer)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is popular computer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(personal computer, is most popular computer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(personal computer, is most popular computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(memory, be low on computer)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(memory, be important in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(memory, be important in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(memory, be important in computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(memory, be in computer measured)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(memory, be important to computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(memory, be important to computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(memory, be important to computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(memory, be important to computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(memory, be in computer measured)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(memory, be needed in computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(memory, be required in computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(memory, be in computer measured)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(memory, be needed in computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(memory, be needed in computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(memory, be needed in computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(memory, be required in computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(memory, be required in computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(memory, be required in computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(memory, be in computer measured)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(memory, be low on computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(personal computer, is computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(personal computer, is popular computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(memory, be low on computer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(personal computer, is most popular computer)