metastasis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.57
, prostate cancer
Weight: 0.55
, characteristic
Weight: 0.53
, condition
Weight: 0.49
, cancer cell
Weight: 0.49
Siblings breast cancer
Weight: 0.34
, apoptosis
Weight: 0.34
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.33
, cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.33
, heart disease
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
is bad people 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(metastasis, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(metastasis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(apoptosis, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(heart disease, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(apoptosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(apoptosis, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(metastasis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(metastasis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breast cancer, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(apoptosis, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(metastasis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)