meteorology: is important science

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.70 , field Weight: 0.60 , discipline Weight: 0.57 , subject Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.56
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.37 , mathematics Weight: 0.36 , astronomy Weight: 0.35 , biology Weight: 0.35 , physics Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is important science	1.00
is science	0.96
be related to life science	0.88
is inexact science	0.80
be important to geography	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(physics, is science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(biology, is science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(astronomy, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(astronomy, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(meteorology, is important science)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(meteorology, is science)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(meteorology, be related to life science)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(meteorology, be related to life science)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(meteorology, be related to life science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(meteorology, is inexact science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(meteorology, is inexact science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(meteorology, be important to geography)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(meteorology, be important to geography)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(meteorology, be important to geography)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be related to life science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be important to geography)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(meteorology, is important science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(computer science, is science)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(biology, is science)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(physics, is science)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(astronomy, is science)