meteorology: is inexact science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.70
, field
Weight: 0.60
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.37
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, astronomy
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is inexact science 1.00
is inexact 0.97
is important science 0.80
is science 0.80
be related to life science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(astronomy, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(meteorology, is inexact science)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is inexact)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(meteorology, is inexact)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(meteorology, is inexact)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is important science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(meteorology, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be related to life science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(meteorology, is important science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(meteorology, be related to life science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(meteorology, is important science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(meteorology, be related to life science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be related to life science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(meteorology, is inexact science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is inexact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(astronomy, is science)