middle finger: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents index finger
Weight: 0.78
, ring finger
Weight: 0.71
, finger
Weight: 0.70
, gesture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thumb
Weight: 0.37
, middle
Weight: 0.35
, pinky
Weight: 0.33
, pinkie
Weight: 0.31
, handshake
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is bad thing 0.79
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(middle finger, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gesture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(middle finger, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gesture, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(gesture, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(gesture, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gesture, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(handshake, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(middle, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(handshake, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(gesture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(handshake, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(handshake, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(middle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(middle, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(handshake, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(handshake, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pinkie, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(middle finger, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(middle finger, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(middle finger, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(handshake, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(middle, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(handshake, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pinkie, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(middle finger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality good)