miner: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.57
, producer
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, occupation
Weight: 0.54
Siblings vale
Weight: 0.44
, mine
Weight: 0.34
, mining
Weight: 0.33
, policeman
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
questions 0.92
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(vale, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(vale, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vale, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mine, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mining, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(miner, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(miner, questions)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(miner, questions)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(miner, questions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(miner, questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(miner, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vale, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mine, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad)