mining: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
was bad 0.85
has quality system 0.82
be bad for health 0.81
has quality news 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality questions 0.75
is good thing 0.75
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(enterprise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(enterprise, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(enterprise, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(enterprise, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(miner, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mining, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mining, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(enterprise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mining, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mining, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(enterprise, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mining, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(miner, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(miner, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(mining, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mining, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mining, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mining, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mining, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(enterprise, has quality system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(enterprise, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(miner, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(enterprise, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(enterprise, has quality system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mining, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)