mining: be cheaper than deep mining

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than deep mining 1.00
remain strip mining 0.79
remove iron ore from mines 0.79
mine 0.78
be for miners 0.78
breathe in mines 0.78
make money mined 0.77
is cheaper 0.77
be more expensive than alamo 0.77
drill in deep water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(oil company, drill in deep water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(miner, remain strip mining)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(miner, remove iron ore from mines)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(miner, breathe in mines)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(miner, make money mined)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(miner, mine)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(enterprise, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(miner, mine)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(miner, mine)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(miner, remain strip mining)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(miner, remain strip mining)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(miner, make money mined)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(miner, make money mined)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(miner, remove iron ore from mines)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(miner, remove iron ore from mines)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(miner, breathe in mines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(miner, breathe in mines)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(oil company, drill in deep water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(oil company, drill in deep water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mining, be for miners)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mining, be for miners)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mining, be for miners)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for miners)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(miner, mine)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(oil company, drill in deep water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(miner, remain strip mining)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(miner, make money mined)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(miner, breathe in mines)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(miner, remove iron ore from mines)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(enterprise, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enterprise, be more expensive than alamo)