mining: be destructive

Property	Similarity
be destructive	1.00
be dangerous	0.78
is dangerous	0.77
was dangerous	0.76
affect destruction of surface of earth	0.75

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(mining, affect destruction of surface of earth)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(mining, affect destruction of surface of earth)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(mining, affect destruction of surface of earth)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mining, be dangerous)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(mining, is dangerous)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(mining, was dangerous)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(mining, be dangerous)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(mining, be dangerous)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(mining, was dangerous)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(mining, is dangerous)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(mining, was dangerous)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(mining, is dangerous)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(mining, is dangerous)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(mining, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(mining, affect destruction of surface of earth)

Parents	enterprise Weight: 0.61 , sector Weight: 0.61 , business activity Weight: 0.60 , environment Weight: 0.59 , occupation Weight: 0.58
Siblings	oil company Weight: 0.34 , miner Weight: 0.33 , automobile industry Weight: 0.33 , banking industry Weight: 0.32 , agriculture Weight: 0.32

mining: be destructive

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings