mining: was dangerous

Related concepts

Parents	enterprise Weight: 0.61 , sector Weight: 0.61 , business activity Weight: 0.60 , environment Weight: 0.59 , occupation Weight: 0.58
Siblings	oil company Weight: 0.34 , miner Weight: 0.33 , automobile industry Weight: 0.33 , banking industry Weight: 0.32 , agriculture Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was dangerous	1.00
is dangerous	0.97
be dangerous	0.96
was bad	0.79
be in danger	0.76
was considered most important	0.76
be destructive	0.76
was important in egyptians	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(environment, be in danger) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(mining, was dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(environment, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(environment, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(miner, is dangerous)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was considered most important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(environment, be in danger) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(mining, was dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(miner, is dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(miner, is dangerous)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(agriculture, was considered most important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(agriculture, was considered most important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(mining, was dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(mining, is dangerous)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(mining, be dangerous)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(mining, is dangerous)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mining, be dangerous)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(mining, is dangerous)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(mining, be dangerous)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(mining, is dangerous)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(mining, be destructive)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(mining, be destructive)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(mining, be destructive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(mining, be destructive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(mining, was dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(environment, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(miner, is dangerous)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(agriculture, was considered most important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(mining, was dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(environment, be in danger)