mode: is easy

Related concepts

Parents	condition Weight: 0.60 , concept Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.58 , setting Weight: 0.58
Siblings	arcade Weight: 0.65 , survival Weight: 0.62 , default Weight: 0.61 , cbc Weight: 0.57 , overlay Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is easy	1.00
becomes easy	0.85
is difficult	0.81
were difficult in andersonville	0.76
is hard	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(setting, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(mode, is easy)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(mode, is easy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(mode, is easy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(setting, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(setting, is hard)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(survival, becomes easy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(setting, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(mode, is easy)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(mode, is easy)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(mode, is easy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(survival, becomes easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(survival, becomes easy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(mode, is easy)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(mode, is difficult)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(mode, is difficult)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(mode, is difficult)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(mode, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(mode, is easy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(concept, is hard)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(setting, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(survival, becomes easy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(concept, is hard)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(mode, is easy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(setting, is hard)