model: be useful to scientist

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to scientist 1.00
be useful in science 0.83
be helpful in science 0.81
be useful in earth science 0.80
be useful in biology 0.78
be important in science 0.78
be beneficial for science 0.78
be used in science 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(theory, be used in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(model, be useful to scientist)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(model, be useful in earth science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(model, be useful in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(model, be useful in earth science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(model, be helpful in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(model, be used in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(model, be used in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(model, be useful in earth science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(model, be useful in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(model, be used in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(model, be useful in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(model, be used in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in earth science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(model, be used in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(model, be used in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(model, be helpful in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, be helpful in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(model, be helpful in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be used in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be used in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, be useful to scientist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful to scientist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(theory, be used in science)