monopoly: be bad for competition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for competition 1.00
affect competition 0.92
is perfect competition 0.90
is bad for 0.79
is good game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, affect competition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(monopoly, affect competition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(monopoly, affect competition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(monopoly, affect competition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(monopoly, is good game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is good game)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monopoly, is good game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for competition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)