monopoly: be good for consumers

Property	Similarity
be good for consumers	1.00
be bad for consumers	0.98
bad for consumers	0.98
be harmful to consumers	0.91
harm consumers	0.88
be harmful to american consumers	0.87

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)

Parents	board game Weight: 0.62 , combination Weight: 0.56 , word Weight: 0.56 , title Weight: 0.54 , game Weight: 0.54
Siblings	capitalism Weight: 0.31 , taboo Weight: 0.31 , mafia Weight: 0.31 , dominion Weight: 0.30 , silence Weight: 0.30

monopoly: be good for consumers

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible