monopoly: harm consumers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
harm consumers 1.00
be harmful to consumers 0.93
be bad for consumers 0.88
bad for consumers 0.88
be good for consumers 0.88
be harmful to american consumers 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(monopoly, harm consumers)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(monopoly, bad for consumers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, bad for consumers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(monopoly, bad for consumers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monopoly, bad for consumers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, harm consumers)