monopoly: be known bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be known bad 1.00
is bad for 0.84
is bad thing 0.79
has quality bad 0.78
be good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monopoly, be known bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monopoly, be known bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monopoly, be known bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(title, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silence, is bad thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be known bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be known bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be known bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(silence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silence, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(silence, is bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mafia, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(monopoly, be known bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monopoly, be known bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(silence, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(silence, is bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mafia, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(monopoly, be known bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)