monotreme: be considered mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, marsupial
Weight: 0.48
, animal
Weight: 0.39
, bird
Weight: 0.26
Siblings platypus
Weight: 0.60
, echidna
Weight: 0.51
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.35
, whale
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered mammals 1.00
be mammals 0.97
is mammals 0.96
be regarded as mammals 0.95
be same as mammals 0.93
be different from mammals 0.93
be classified as mammals 0.93
be similar to mammals 0.93
have classed as mammals marsupials 0.91
be similar to other mammals 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsupial, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marsupial, is mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be same as mammals)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, is mammals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(mammal, is mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(echidna, is mammals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(platypus, is mammals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, is mammals)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsupial, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(whale, is mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(platypus, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(platypus, is mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(echidna, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(echidna, is mammals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(monotreme, is mammals)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(monotreme, be mammals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(monotreme, is mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be mammals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, is mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(monotreme, be mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(monotreme, is mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(marsupial, is mammals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(echidna, is mammals)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(platypus, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(whale, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(marsupial, is mammals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)