monotreme: have classed as mammals marsupials

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, marsupial
Weight: 0.48
, animal
Weight: 0.39
, bird
Weight: 0.26
Siblings platypus
Weight: 0.60
, echidna
Weight: 0.51
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.35
, whale
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have classed as mammals marsupials 1.00
be considered mammals 0.91
be mammals 0.90
be classified as mammals 0.90
is mammals 0.90
be regarded as mammals 0.89
differ from marsupials 0.89
be same as mammals 0.88
be different from mammals 0.87
be similar to mammals 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsupial, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marsupial, is mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be same as mammals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, is mammals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(mammal, is mammals)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be similar to mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(echidna, is mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(platypus, is mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, is mammals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsupial, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(whale, is mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(platypus, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(platypus, is mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(echidna, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(echidna, is mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(monotreme, be mammals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(monotreme, is mammals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(monotreme, differ from marsupials)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be mammals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(monotreme, is mammals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, differ from marsupials)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(monotreme, be mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(monotreme, is mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(monotreme, differ from marsupials)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, differ from marsupials)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, is mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(marsupial, is mammals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(echidna, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(platypus, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(whale, is mammals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(marsupial, is mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(marsupial, be similar to mammals)