mountain: be at state park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
, earth
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, lava
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state park 1.00
be at park 0.91
be at state 0.86
be a part of state 0.82
be at western state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mountain, be at state park)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(city, be a part of state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mountain, be at state park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(city, be a part of state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(city, be at state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(city, be a part of state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hill, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be at state park)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(city, be a part of state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be at state park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hill, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hill, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mountain, be at state park)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at western state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(mountain, be at western state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mountain, be at western state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be at western state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mountain, be at state park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hill, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(mountain, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)