mountain: be at western state

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, sight
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.59
, earth
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hill
Weight: 0.35
, waterfall
Weight: 0.34
, boulder
Weight: 0.34
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, lava
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at western state 1.00
be at state 0.84
be a part of state 0.82
be at mountainous region 0.77
be at state park 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mountain, be at western state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(city, be a part of state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mountain, be at western state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(city, be a part of state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(city, be at state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(city, be a part of state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be at western state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(city, be a part of state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be at western state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(mountain, be at western state)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mountain, be at mountainous region)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at state park)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mountain, be at state park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mountain, be at state park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mountain, be at state park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mountain, be at mountainous region)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at mountainous region)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mountain, be at mountainous region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at western state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mountain, be at western state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mountain, be at western state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)