mri: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, modality
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, brain
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.33
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.33
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
like cost 0.78
more is expensive than ct 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ultrasound, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mri, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mri, like cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mri, like cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mri, more is expensive than ct)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mri, like cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mri, more is expensive than ct)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mri, more is expensive than ct)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mri, like cost)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mri, more is expensive than ct)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mri, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mri, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mri machine, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mri, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ultrasound, is expensive)