mri: like cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, modality
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, brain
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.33
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.33
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
like cost 1.00
is expensive 0.78
scans much cost 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mri machine, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mri machine, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ultrasound, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mri, like cost)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mri, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mri, scans much cost)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mri, scans much cost)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mri, scans much cost)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mri, scans much cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mri, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mri, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mri, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mri, like cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mri, like cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mri machine, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mri, like cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ultrasound, is expensive)