mummification: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.49
, custom
Weight: 0.45
, aspect
Weight: 0.43
, practice
Weight: 0.41
, thing
Weight: 0.40
Siblings decomposition
Weight: 0.31
, fermentation
Weight: 0.31
, embalming
Weight: 0.31
, digestion
Weight: 0.30
, extraction
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
was important to egytians 0.85
has quality good 0.84
was good way preserve 0.81
was done 0.79
was important to egyptians 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mummification, was good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(digestion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(embalming, was important to egyptians)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mummification, was good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(digestion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(digestion, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(embalming, was important to egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(embalming, was important to egyptians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mummification, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mummification, was done)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mummification, was done)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mummification, was important to egytians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mummification, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mummification, was good way preserve)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mummification, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(digestion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(embalming, was important to egyptians)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mummification, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)