mussel: be problem in inland waters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.64
, mollusk
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, seafood
Weight: 0.53
Siblings shellfish
Weight: 0.35
, oyster
Weight: 0.35
, algae
Weight: 0.35
, snail
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in inland waters 1.00
be problem in waters 0.92
be important to river life 0.77
be bad for lakes 0.77
live in intertidal zone 0.76
be found in intertidal zone 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(oyster, live in intertidal zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(oyster, live in intertidal zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(oyster, live in intertidal zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mussel, live in intertidal zone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mussel, live in intertidal zone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mussel, live in intertidal zone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mussel, live in intertidal zone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mussel, be found in intertidal zone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mussel, be important to river life)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mussel, be found in intertidal zone)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be found in intertidal zone)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mussel, be important to river life)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mussel, be important to river life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mussel, be found in intertidal zone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be important to river life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(oyster, live in intertidal zone)