name: matter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symbol
Weight: 0.69
, nickname
Weight: 0.68
, identifier
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.62
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.85
, alias
Weight: 0.65
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.63
, description
Weight: 0.63
, username
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
matter 1.00
matter today 0.94
matters 0.81
matter to consumers 0.77
matter for customers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(brand, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(symbol, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(brand, matter today)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(brand, matters)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(brand, matter to consumers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(symbol, matter)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(brand, matter)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(brand, matters)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(brand, matter today)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(brand, matter to consumers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(brand, matter for customers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter today)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter to consumers)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(symbol, matter)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brand, matters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(brand, matter)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(name, matter)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(symbol, matter)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(name, matter)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(brand, matter today)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(name, matter)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(brand, matters)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(name, matter)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(brand, matter to consumers)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(name, matter)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(name, matter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(name, matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(symbol, matter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, matter)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, matters)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(brand, matter to consumers)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brand, matter today)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, matter for customers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(symbol, matter)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, matter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, matters)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(brand, matter to consumers)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brand, matter today)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(name, matter)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, matter for customers)