brand: matter for customers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
matter for customers 1.00
be important to customers 0.93
matter to consumers 0.87
matter for manufacturers 0.77
matter to manufacturers 0.76
matter 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, matter for customers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(symbol, matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, matter for customers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(symbol, matter)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(name, matter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(symbol, matter)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(name, matter)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(premium, matter)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(label, matter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(name, matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(brand, matter for customers)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(symbol, matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(brand, matter for customers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(label, matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(label, matter)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(premium, matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(premium, matter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brand, matter for customers)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brand, be important to customers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brand, be important to customers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to customers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, matter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(brand, matter to consumers)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, matter for customers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(symbol, matter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(label, matter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(premium, matter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(symbol, matter)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(brand, matter for customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(name, matter)