brand: be important to customers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to customers 1.00
matter for customers 0.93
matter to consumers 0.79
be important to business 0.77
be important to companies 0.76
achieve customer engagement 0.75
be important to consumer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brand, be important to customers)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter for customers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brand, matter for customers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(brand, matter for customers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter to consumers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(brand, achieve customer engagement)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(brand, matter to consumers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to companies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(brand, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brand, be important to companies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to consumer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(brand, be important to consumer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(brand, achieve customer engagement)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, matter for customers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(brand, matter to consumers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to companies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(brand, matter to consumers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to consumer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(brand, be important to consumer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(brand, be important to companies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brand, be important to business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(brand, achieve customer engagement)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(brand, achieve customer engagement)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to customers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brand, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brand, be important to customers)