national parks: be different from regular parks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from regular parks 1.00
be different from parks 0.95
be called parks 0.88
have name parks 0.86
have name national parks 0.85
is national park important 0.82
be number on national park 0.82
is park important 0.82
is national park 0.82
be number on park 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(park, be called parks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(park, be called parks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, have name national parks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is national park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be different from regular parks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, have name national parks)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(park, is national park)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(park, be called parks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on national park)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on park)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is park important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(national park, is national park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(park, be called parks)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(national park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(national park, is national park)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on national park)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be number on national park)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on park)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be number on park)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(yellowstone, is park important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is park important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is national park)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is national park important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(national parks, be different from regular parks)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(national parks, be different from parks)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from parks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from parks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(national parks, have name national parks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(national parks, have name parks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from parks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(park, be called parks)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be different from regular parks)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have name national parks)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is national park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be number on national park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be number on park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is national park)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is park important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is national park important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be different from regular parks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(park, be called parks)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have name national parks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)