national parks: have name national parks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have name national parks 1.00
have name parks 0.96
is national park 0.91
be called parks 0.90
is national park important 0.89
be different from parks 0.88
be number on national park 0.88
be different from regular parks 0.85
was recognized as national park 0.82
is national park important to america 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(park, be called parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(park, be called parks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, have name national parks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is national park)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, have name national parks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(park, is national park)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be different from regular parks)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(park, be called parks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important to america)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on national park)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, was recognized as national park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(national park, is national park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(park, be called parks)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(national park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(national park, is national park)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important to america)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is national park important to america)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on national park)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be number on national park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is national park)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is national park important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(yellowstone, was recognized as national park)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, was recognized as national park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(national parks, have name national parks)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from parks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(national parks, have name parks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(national parks, be different from parks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from parks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from parks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(park, be called parks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have name national parks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be different from regular parks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is national park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is national park important to america)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be number on national park)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is national park)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(yellowstone, was recognized as national park)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is national park important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(park, be called parks)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have name national parks)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be different from regular parks)