national parks: have name parks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have name parks 1.00
have name national parks 0.96
be called parks 0.93
be different from parks 0.91
be different from regular parks 0.86
is park 0.85
be called park 0.84
is national park 0.83
is park important 0.82
be number on park 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(park, be called parks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(park, be called parks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, have name national parks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is national park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, have name national parks)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be different from regular parks)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(park, is national park)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(park, be called parks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is park important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is park)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(central park, be called park)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(national park, is park)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(national park, is national park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, have name national parks)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(park, be called parks)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, be different from regular parks)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name parks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(national park, is park)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(national park, is park)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(national park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(national park, is national park)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(central park, be called park)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(central park, be called park)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(yellowstone, is park)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is park)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(yellowstone, be number on park)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be number on park)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is national park)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(yellowstone, is park important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is park important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(national parks, have name parks)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name national parks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(national parks, have name national parks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(national parks, have name national parks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from parks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(national parks, have name national parks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(national parks, be different from parks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from parks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from parks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(national parks, be different from regular parks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(national parks, be different from regular parks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, have name parks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(park, be called parks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have name national parks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be different from regular parks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is park)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is national park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(central park, be called park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is park)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be number on park)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is national park)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is park important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(park, be called parks)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have name national parks)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be different from regular parks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, have name parks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)